REVEAL’s methodology has recently gotten some attention in the Blogosphere mostly due to Sociology professor Bradley Wright’s thoughtful 11-part treatment on his blog.
If you have any questions about the nuts-‘n-bolts of REVEAL’s research approach, I encourage you to share them here in the comments. The last week in January, we will interview our two key researchers, Eric Arnson and Terry Schweizer for the REVEAL podcast. They’ll answer your questions and we’ve also invited Bradley Wright to join them for a detailed discussion about the issues he raises in his posts. (Update: Bradley is working out some scheduling issues and it looks like he’ll be able to make it)
In the meantime, I have some initial responses to Professor Wright’s blog posts I hope will answer some basic questions people are having. Know that I have great respect for the thoroughness of his academic overview and insights. I think he does a terrific job describing REVEAL’s research from the lens of a social scientist.
Who does REVEAL serve?
REVEAL’s intended audience is senior pastors, and our goal is to give them a tool akin to the finest available in the secular world to help them better understand their congregation and make the best decisions possible to advance God’s kingdom in their local church.
If REVEAL were primarily intended for social scientists, our research approach would have been very different. Our goal has not been to create an empirical view of spiritual growth based on randomized, longitudinal samples as suggested by Professor Wright. We plan to do that eventually, but it’s not our primary aim. Our current goal is to help senior pastors gain important insight real-time…today…not years from now.
Reaction from pastors in the 200 churches has affirmed our sense that these results have much to offer. More than once, we’ve heard pastors say things like “I had a feeling this is where my people are, but now I have evidence to back it up”.
We hear from many pastors that having the results from REVEAL in black and white can be a call to action. In February, we will interview a few senior pastors whose churches have taken part in REVEAL to hear their perspectives on how REVEAL’s findings have impacted their ministry.
Why Marketplace Research instead of Social Science Research?
In the marketplace, where I first experienced the power of this kind of research, we did not wait for longitudinal data, which can take years. We did “point-in-time” research – or, as Professor Wright refers to it, “cross-sectional” research – capturing people’s attitudes, motivations, behaviors, and needs regarding our products/services at a singular moment.
From that “point in time,” we extrapolated a hypothesis about how the market worked and where we fit into that market, based on customer needs. Then we made decisions. The power of this point-in-time “attitude-and-behavior-based” research is evident in the extraordinary success of organizations that rely on it.
The goal of REVEAL is to put “attitude-and-behavior-based” knowledge in the hands of senior pastors as input into their prayerful decision-making. That’s what REVEAL is all about – informing decisions based on “applied” marketplace research.
What’s Next for REVEAL?
Stay tuned for more REVEAL findings. We have a long-term commitment to understanding spiritual growth and our view is growing and changing as we add to our database (we now have over 60,000 responses from 200 churches). We’ll add an additional 300 churches in the next two months including 100 international churches.
In the meantime, we are confident that REVEAL’s methodology reflects the same high analytic standards that have inspired countless success stories in organizations around the world. Our hope is that we’ll provide that same level of insight to churches, large and small, and that we’ll all learn together what God wants to reveal to us.
We are also hopeful, as Professor Wright concluded at the end of his 11-part series on REVEAL “…that REVEAL will be looked upon as an important step in the American Christian Church discovering the value of empirical data.”